Sunday 8 October 2023

A Visit to Lewes.

 A Visit to Lewes.

 A few weeks ago, I visited the market town of Lewes in Sussex, best known to me as the site of the crucial defeat of King Henry III and his son, the Lord Edward, in May 1264.

My only other visit to the town was back in the late 1990s, when I was the "Medieval Weapons Expert" in a TV episode about a skull (see below) that had been found at the medieval hospital site in Lewes and was thought to be a casualty of the battle. 

In fact, when carbon dated some years later, the skull was found to be from 200 years before the Battle of Lewes and contemporary with the Battle of Hastings. For more on this take a look at this article.

Anyway back to my recent visit, the first place I went to was Lewes Castle, a rarity amongst English castles as it was built with two mottes and the bailey between them. It was first built by William de Warenne in 1068, early in the Norman Conquest. At first, it was constructed of timber and had a single motte. By 1100, the timber palisade had been replaced by stone and the shell keep that still survives had been built.

 

 
The 12th century gatehouse to the left and the much larger 14th century barbican to the right.

 
Looking at the surviving shell keep from by the gatehouse.
 
Two views of the remaining shell keep wall and tower from different angles (complete with obligatory historic site scaffolding). 
 

The clump of trees indicated is where the castle's second motte was with the bailey lying in between them.

This picture looks north from the remaining shell keep towards the site of the battle in 1264.

Sadly, I didn't have time to get up to the battlefield site but hopefully I will be back in this area again next year and I'll try to fit it in.

This model gives an idea of how the castle site looked around the time of the battle.

 

Opposite the castle is the Barbican House Museum which houses the town's archaeology and local history exhibitions.

Some 13th century floor tiles on display in the museum. I particularly like the knight on the left and the king on the right who may be Edward I. Apologies for the reflections; it was a very sunny day.

 

I also had a quick look at Lewes Priory as most of its remains are in a public park. 

 

Lewes Priory was founded by William de Warenne and his wife Gundrada around 1081 on the site of an earlier Saxon timber church.  It was a community of Cluniac monks, the first in Britain.  The priory was dedicated to St. Pancreas. The Priory's church was huge, bigger than some cathedrals, echoing the church at the order's founding house of "Reformed Benedictines" at Cluny in France. For more information about the Priory, take a look at the website of the Lewes Priory Trust.

  

Part of the monks' dormitory.

In 1264, before riding out to the Battle of Lewes on the 14th May, King Henry III stayed in the priory. After losing the battle, Henry retreated, with many of his remaining troops, back into the Priory precinct. Simon de Montfort attacked the priory and forced over Henry to surrender.

 

The Priory's toilet block (probably heavily used on that morning in May).

It was in the priory, shortly after the battle, that Henry signed the “Mise of Lewes” stating that he would accept the rulings of the Barons effectively making Simon de Monfort the "de facto" ruler of the kingdom.

 


Also in the park, there is a memorial to those who fought and died in the Battle of Lewes in 1264 that was unveiled on the 700th anniversary.  Sir Tufton Beamish MP wrote "Battle Royale", one of the better books (although now slightly outdated) on Simon de Montfort's rebellion.

Saturday 12 August 2023

New gear - A leather scrip.

 New gear - A leather scrip.

I need a new bag to carry all those thirteenth century essentials like dice, flint & steel, possibly the odd piece of bread and cheese and, of course, my asthma inhaler. The design I have chosen came from this Facebook post by "Cives Regni Siciliae". 

 

It is based this depiction of a bag on a Flemish town seal from Oudenaarde dated to 1275-1305.

The bag and the closure strap are made from quite thin goatskin and the shoulder strap is made from a thicker piece of pigskin for extra strength.  The main body of the bag measures fourteen inches (355mm) wide by seven inches (177mm) deep and so should be big enough to be of use if I decide to go pilgrimage.

 

The bag is unrooled on the left and the top tube is rolled down and buckled on the right.

The small buckle for the closure strap is one that I found on-line which reminded me of this 12th/13th century Welsh bust of a king.

The lefthand picture is from Museum Wales - found at Deganwy Castle, north Wales, in 1965. Deganwy Castle had changed hands many times, but from 1213 it was rebuilt by Llywelyn. This head, which dates from this period, may represent Llywelyn himself

Wearing it at the Battle of Evesham event, I found that it defintely makes in hard to lose small items by tipping them out of the opening and it is very secure.


Thursday 10 August 2023

The Battle of Evesham 2023 - a brief After Action Report.

The Battle of Evesham 2023

- a brief After Action Report.

Last weekend (4-6th August), I had the pleasure of taking part in the Battle of Evesham event for the first time. This is the biggest 13th century re-enactment in Britain and possibly in Europe (or even the world according to the local newspaper) with around 35 groups taking part. One group of three men camped next to us had are members of Pisa Ghibellina and had come over from Italy!  Mick Hurst, the organiser, has told me that there were 622 re-enactors and 20 horses at the event. Due to the bad weather, the visitor figures were slightly down on last year but still numbered over 25,000.

The event was very well organised and things were quickly adapted through the day to take the rather wet but changeable weather into account.  Those key things for re-enactors in the authentic camp, firewood & water were well supplied and easy to access.  So my thanks to the team that run the event for making life easy.

Unfortunately, due to the weather on Saturday and then being busy with the visitors on Sunday, I only managed to take a few photos done myself, mainly quick shots of my kit and little miner’s set up.  Happily, there are many people who came and took shots of the camps and the battles and they have generously posted the on the event’s Facebook group with permission for re-enactors to use their pictures on our blogs & web sites.

The damp march through the town and commemoration at the memorial.

 

The Fitzalan contingent (Photograph by Pat Patrick)

On the Saturday morning, the Festival started with a march through the town. Although it was raining fairly heavily on and off, I was impressed by the number of townsfolk & visitors who lined the route under their umbrellas. It’s nice to be appreciated 😊 .

(photographer not known)

We returned to the memorial where we heard a quick account of the battle and the speeches were made by the town’s Mayor & the Bishop of Dudley before a wreath was laid in memory of all who died in the battle.

 

The main Battle display.

This took place in the afternoon on both days and the rain gods relented to let us do it in the dry both times!

 

Lord Fitzalan and some of his gallant retainers head to the battlefield to take their places in the Lord Edward’s centre division which took the brunt of the enemy attacks.          (Photograph possibly by Pat Patrick but not sure)

The Heroic Lord Edward. (Photo by Louise Hussey)


The Dastardly Simon de Montfort on his horse which was apparently named “King” – Irony intended? 
(Photo by Louise Hussey)

  

Fitzalan’s little force engaged in hard fighting in the middle of the battle. One of the many pictures of our best side – the backs of our heads. (Photograph by Greg Phaedra)

 

Our inevitable victory as God was, of course, on OUR side. (photo by Pat Patrick)

That being so, the youngest of our contingent did get to kill the Montfortian Bishop as the crowd cheered. Chess puns allowed.  The Bishop ran away in the second battle so I had to make do killing with a Knight-Hospitaller who had strayed from the righteous path to support de Montfort.

 

Of the many groups there, the two groups we had the most contact with (one quite literally) during the event need a quick mention:

  

(photgraph by Corporate-Motion Film Production)

The House of the Twin Tailed Lion (Facebook page here & web site here):

Our main opponents during the battle display as they formed the centre of the rebel line. They are based in Evesham itself. They re-enact as troops from the De Montfort household.

Nice chaps, it was a pleasure to slaughter them mercilessly as the battle ended in their defeat.

 and 

 
The Corbett Household (Facebook page here):

Despite the long and often violent relationship between the historical Fitzalans and Corbetts, we managed not to stab each other in the back while we both held the left flank of the Lord Edward’s centre division during the battle display. I still swear that the 40 Corbett cattle followed me home from the tavern that night and we only borrowed them.

There was also a display based on the Battle of Lewes (1264), which the Royalists lost, in the morning on the Sunday. Sadly, I missed this one as I was busy sorting out my mining kit as I couldn’t get it done on Saturday due to the rain.

 

What did I do when I wasn’t fighting?

On the Saturday, I largely sheltered from the rain and played board games, Tallfwrdd and Alquerque being the main ones. Dressed as Welshman, I had a very quick part in the civilian fashion parade and then kitted up for battle.

On Sunday, I got dressed in my new kit (over the 15 year or so gap in medieval re-enactment, the moths had found several pieces of my old kit) and swiftly constructed my little mantlet as part of my new siege mining set up.  There was quite a bit of interest amongst the Public and fellow re-enactors, mainly in the tools I had laid out.  I ended up having two nice long chats with a retired South African mining engineer and someone from the Forest of Dean who actually knew where the places that I was talking about were.

Myself and my wife in our new (and very Maciejowski / Morgan bible inspired)  kit.

 

My new Siege mining set up.

This was the first outing for this and more quickly but together than I would have liked.  The little shelter is supposed to be a temporary siege mantlet with a “raw” cow hide over it which they used for fireproofing against those hot arrows. Not too bad for a first try but I have several improvements in mind for next time.

  

My small display.

My miner’s tool kit.

I enjoyed the event very much, once again thanks to the hard work put in by the team that run it, and all the re-enactors who make it fun.

I will definitely be going back next year!


Sunday 23 July 2023

Medieval Games - Tallfwrdd - a Welsh board game

 Medieval Games

Tallfwrdd

a Welsh board game

This game is mentioned in three of the Welsh legends in the Mabinogion: The Dream of Magnus Maximus, Peredur son of Efrawg and the Dream of Rhonabwy.  

Tallfwrdd (literally peg-board) is described in the mid-tenth century Cyfrraith Hywel Dda (The Laws of Hywel Dda) which specifies the value of various boards provided to the members of the king’s court. 

A similar game is refered to in a 16th century manuscript that has the same main rule but players roll a die and need to get an even number before they can make their move otherwise their opponent gets a dice throw to see if they get to move. 

It is clearly related to the Viking game of "Hfentafl" as it has a King in the centre of the board, protected by 8 bodyguards and his oppents have 16 men to attack him.

Rules:

The sixteen attackers and the king's eight bodyguards are placed on the board as shown in the photograph above.

The king's side wins if he reaches the safety of a the corner square.  The king loses if the attackers prevent him doing this. The king can also be captured at the edge of the board by being surrounded by three opposing pieces or in the middle of the board if surrounded by four pieces.

Only the king is allowed to move on or through the centre square or the 4 corner squares. 

Each piece can only move one orthogonal (i.e. up/down or left/right and not diagonally) space at a time.

You take an opponent’s piece by getting it between two of your own. 

A piece can move in between two opposing pieces without being captured. 

Even if it is not occupied by the king, the centre square counts as an additional ‘man’ ie any piece (except the king) sandwiched between it and another piece is captured. 

No survivng rules tell us which side starts play first but in general you will get a better game  if the attackers begin the game.

Friday 14 July 2023

The Battle of Evesham event - 5th & 6th August 2023

The Battle of Evesham event

5th & 6th August 2023.

This year will be the first time that I have taken part in the Battle of Evesham event.  Over the past few years, this event has become the premier 13th century re-enactment in Britain. Last year around 35,000 visitors came to the weekend.

Commemorating the battle in August 1265 in which Simon de Montfort, Earl of Leicester, who was the leader of the 2nd Baronial rebellion was defeated and killed. For my write-up of the battle go here.

 


Full details about the Battle of Evesham 2023 can be found on this web site with further updates on their Facebook page.

See you there!


The Battle of Evesham - 4th August 1265

 The Battle of Evesham

4th August 1265.

This was the second of the two major battles of what we now call the 2nd Baronial War or Earl Simon de Montfort's rebellion.  It is also the site of the biggest 13th century re-enactment event in Britain, for more information about that, see this post.

The lead up to the battle.

Earl Simon de Montfort had captured Henry III and his son Prince Edward at the Battle of Lewes in 1264 and governed England in the king's name for a year. He had even called Parliaments in June 1264 and January 1265, however, this did not end the conflict.

Part of the "Form of Peace" signed between Simon de Montfort's administration and King Henry and Lord Edward in January 1265. You can see more and a transcription on the National Archives webpages.

Earl Simon drew up the "Treaty of Pipton" which was signed by the then captive King Henry on 22nd June 1265.  It recognised Llywelyn, Prince of Gwynedd, as "Prince of Wales".  Llywelyn was attacking lands in the Welsh Marches, as he tried to extend his principality and this alliance caused many of de Montfort's Marcher-Lord followers to withdraw their support for him and his government.

Simon de Montfort's real troubles began when Lord Edward escaped from captivity in Hereford on 28th May 1265 (more on this in a future post). Edward was assisted by Roger Mortimer (a Marcher-Lord loyal to the Crown) and quickly met up with Gilbert de Clare (Earl of Gloucester), who had been one of de Montfort's strongest allies, William de Valence (Earl of Pembroke & King Henry's half-brother) and John de Warenne (Earl of Surrey).

Edward and de Clare raised a large army and intended to block Earl Simon's attempts to head eastwards across the River Severn. Edward rapidly took Worcester and advanced on Gloucester, where Royalist troops captured the town, although the castle held out, in mid-June. 

Unable to use the bridges over the Severn, Earl Simon marched south to Monmouth the Newport, aiming to cross to Bristol by ship. After a Royalist night raid by sea destroyed his fleet, de Montfort returned to Hereford. 

De Montfort's son, Simon (the younger), was advancing slowly west from London, first to Winchester, then to Oxford and on to Northampton. At the end of July. he paused briefly at Kenilworth intending to head south towards Worcester to join his father's forces.

Lord Edward was at Worcester and about to be caught in a pincer movement by Simon the younger advancing east from Kenilworth, and his father coming north from Hereford. 

Edward sent  a mounted force in the direction of Shrewsbury to make the Montfortians think he was withdrawing north. In fact, his spy network had informed him where young Simon's army was and that more than half of it was billeted in Kenilworth village rather than safely ensconced in the large castle. By doing a forced march overnight, with some of his infantry in carts to make more speed, Edward's men reached Kenilworth at dawn on 2nd August. 

Kenilworth castle today.

According to writers at the time, many of the Montfortian knights had chosen to spend the night in the relative comfort of the village and ten to twenty of them were quickly captured including the Earl of Oxford. Many  unrecorded foot-soldiers were killed too.

Simon the younger escaped by boat across the castle's extensive water defences, some sources say he was clad only in his nightshirt. Part of his army was safe inside the castle as Edward's lightly equipped force had no way to attack the fortress.

Edward's victorious troops returned to Worcester, where he learnt that Earl Simon had finally crossed the Severn near Kempsey and was moving towards Evesham.

 

The battle.

Edward prepared to deal with de Montfort who was now once more on the east bank of the Severn and who, by the morning of 4 August, had reached Evesham.

The Old Version.

(largely based upon the chronicle of William Rishanger, a Benedictine monk at St. Albans., who wrote his account of the battle many years after it had happened).

Needing to rest his road-weary troops, de Montfort spent the night of August 3rd at the Abbey in Evesham. His lookouts on the Abbey tower are said to have seen Lord Edward’s force approaching under the banners of de Montfort’s son, Simon the younger (which they had captured at Kenilworth), giving the baronial force false hope. This was dashed as the royal army took up positions on the ridge of Green Hill, just north of Evesham with Lord Edward on the left, and Gilbert de Clare, Earl of Gloucester on the right. 

Roger Mortimer led his men to the east and crossed the river coming back towards Evesham and blocking de Montfort’s route of retreat over the bridge near the Abbey.

Rishanger says that the baronial forces, numbering approximately 8,000 (5,000 of which were Welsh infantry) men, wore white crosses on their clothing whilst the Royalists, with around 10,000 men, wore red ones.

Around 8.00am, Simon de Montfort moved his troops north to prepare for battle just as a great thunderstorm started. De Montfort, realising how heavily out numbered he was, tried a charge to break through the royalist forces. He was probably hoping then hea2d north to meet up with his son, Simon the younger’s men that he thought were coming south from Kenilworth (see above)  to his aid. His charge was unsuccessful and the royalist forces swung in on his flanks and surrounded him. His Welsh soldiers fled and were massacred down by the river by the Marcher troops of Roger Mortimer.

Simon de Montfort's eldest son Henry was killed first, then Simon was dismounted and died fighting on foot. His body was mutilated; his head, hands, feet and testicles cut off. 

King Henry himself, who had been a prisoner of de Montfort since the Battle of Lewes in May the year before, was barely rescued from the mêlée by Roger de Leybourne, allegedly Henry had thrown off his helmet and was shouting “I am Harry of Winchester, your King; do not kill me!” 

 

The New Version.

A new source, written in Norman French was found on the back of the roll which is now College of Arms, MS 3/23 B. (see Olivier de Laborderie et al. below). It appears to be an eyewitness account of the battle and its details give a different story to the one above.

Map of the battle from the Visit Evesham web site

In this version, now widely accepted as a more accurate account, Mortimer’s section of the royalist army did not block the bridge but formed on Green Hill as the right flank, with Lord Edward in the centre and de Clare on the left flank. 

It is thought Edward may have deliberately left the bridge clear initially as he believed that a bottled up enemy force with no avenue of escape would fight harder than one where men could flee away if routed. Another possibility is that he did send a small force over the ford to swing round and block the bridge but it had not arrived there by the time of the battle but reached the bridge in time to catch many of the fleeing Montfortians, especially the Welsh infantry.

This new source mentions that de Montfort's banner bearer, Guy de Balliol, shattered his lance (considered a bad omen by Earl Simon) on the abbey gate riding out to fight and that de Montfort told many of his knights to think of their wives and families and leave, which they refused to do. It also mentions that Edward and de Clare knighted several of their followers immediately before the battle.

The battle more or less followed the same  format as above apart from de Montfort seems to have charged straight into Edward's section of the royalist army.

Unlike the Battle of Lewes the previous year, the traditional custom of capturing enemy knights for ransom was disregarded. At Evesham, it would seem, Edward was determined that no quarter was to be given and the Montfortian knights were to be killed. Edward had selected twelve of his strongest and most able men-at-arms to seek out and kill Simon de Montfort. It was said that it was Roger de Mortimer who finally killed him. This does make more sense if Mortimer is in the main battle and not at the bridge.

 

The Immediate Aftermath.

Lord Edward’s victorious soldier chased the remaining baronial troops down into Evesham killing most of them and sacking the town and the Abbey.

Whichever version of the battle you prefer, we do know that the death toll was light for the Royalists and very heavy for de Montfort’s men as another chronicler, Robert of Gloucester , (again writing some years after the battle) described it as "a murder of Evesham for battle it was none."

It has been said that of the hundred and sixty knights who accompanied Earl Simon on the field, only twelve survived.  This must be taken with a pinch of salt as all the surviving lists from the period only seem to record around thirty dead knights and six or so captured. Of course, we do not know the casualty figures for the poor common soldiery but it is though that over 80% of the Montfortian soldiers were slaughtered either in the battle or as they were trying to escape in the rout afterwards.

 

Simon's remains and the bodies of his son Henry and that of Hugh le Despenser were carried away by the monks and buried near the High Altar of the Abbey.

Soon after this stories of miracles began to circulate and many people made pilgrimages to the Abbey and to the Battle Well- said to be a source of healing.

 

Sources for this article:

Olivier de Laborderie, J. R. Maddicott and D. A. Carpenter, ‘The Last Hours of Simon de Montfort: A New Account’, English Historical Review 115 (2000), 378-412. 

Dr David Carpenter. "The Battles of Lewes & Evesham 1264/65". British Battlefields Series, Mercian Publications Limited (1987).

 Dvid Pilling. "Rebellion Against Henry III- The Disinherited Montfortians". Pen & Sword (2020).